Vol 6, No 6 (2015) > Industrial Engineering >

Improvement of Layout Production Facilities for a Secondary Packaging Area of a Pharmaceutical Company in Indonesia using the Corelap Method

Inaki Maulida Hakim, Vidyahningtyas Istiyanti

 

Abstract:

This research is for one of the pharmaceutical
companies in Indonesia. The company's production area is composed of two parts,
namely a Black Area and a Grey Area for processing and packaging. There are
four types of packaging in the Secondary Packaging Area. Each type of packaging
uses different processes, but there are also some processes that are used by
all types of packaging. Based on these observations, the layout of the
production area for secondary packaging in the pharmaceutical company is not
optimal because the material handling distances are still quite long and there
are some similar processes for same packaging type that are not adjacent, so
that the production process is inefficient. This study aims to redesign the
layout in the area with the Computerized Relationship Layout Planning (CORELAP)
method. Data such as the name of the process, the order of the process, and the
relationship between processes into the Activity Relationship Chart (ARC), are
subsequently processed to obtain the Total Closeness Rating (TCR) values for each
process iterated with the CORELAP method. From the calculations, the proposed
layout has material handling distances that are shortened by 9.017% compared
with the current layout. The same type of packaging processes are located in
adjacent positions.

Keywords: ARC; CORELAP; Facility layout planning; Pharmaceutical; Secondary packaging

Full PDF Download

References


Apple, J.M., 1990. Plant Layout and Material Handling (3rd ed). Bandung: ITB

Drira, A., Pierreval, H., Gabouj, S.H., 2007. Facility Layout Problems: A Survey. Annual Reviews in Control, Volume 31, pp. 255–267

Hidayat, N.P.A., 2011. Layout Design on Finishing Department of CV. SG-Bandung. Industrial Engineering Journal, pp. 137–146

Heragu, S.S., 2008. Facilities Design (3rd ed). USA: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group

Khan, A.J., Tidke, D.J., 2013. Designing Facilities Layout for Small and Medium Enterprises. International Journal of Engineering Resesarch and General Science, Volume 1(2), pp. 1–8

Kriel, M., 2010. Optimizing Facility Layout through Simulation. University of Pretoria. Pretoria

Moore, J.M., 1962. Plant Layout and Design (1st ed). New York: The Macmillan Company

Purnomo, H., 2004. Facilities Planning and Design. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu (in Bahasa)

Setiawati, L., 2012. Production Facility Layout Improvements using Blocplan Algorithm. Industrial Engineering Journal Bung Hatta University, Volume 1(2), pp. 206–216

Siregar, R.M., Sukatendel, D., Tarigan, U., 2013. Re-layout Design of Production Facility by Implementing BLOCPLAN Algorithm and CORELAP Algorithm at PT. XYZ. Industrial Engineering E-Journal FT USU, Volume 1(1), pp. 35–44

Sutantra, Y., Natalia, C., 2010. Layout Improvement at CV Merapi based on Computerized Relationship Layout Planning (CORELAP) Method. Metric Journal of Katolik Atma Jaya Jakarta University, Industrial Engineering Study Program, Volume 11(1), pp. 31–36

Wignjosoebroto, S., 2003. Plant Layout and Material Handling (3rd ed). Surabaya: Guna Widya (in Bahasa)

Weng, L., 1999. Efficient and Flexible Algorithm for Plant Layout Generation. Published Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Industrial and Management System Engineering West Virginia University, West Virginia